<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uh oh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesoff.net/site/2006/05/04/uh-oh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesoff.net/site/2006/05/04/uh-oh/</link>
	<description>you heard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Legooolas</title>
		<link>http://jamesoff.net/site/2006/05/04/uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Legooolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 21:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesoff.net/site/2006/05/04/uh-oh/#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was just reading about how an online betting company &quot;protects&quot; themself against DDoS after an extortion attempt, by paying $50,000 a year to a security company who have to have more bandwidth than the combination of attackers and does lovely filtering for you so you don&#039;t see the traffic.  This seems a bit of a sledgehammer to crack a nut approach, but what else can be done about it (DDoS attacks) at the moment?  :(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reading about how an online betting company &#8220;protects&#8221; themself against DDoS after an extortion attempt, by paying $50,000 a year to a security company who have to have more bandwidth than the combination of attackers and does lovely filtering for you so you don&#8217;t see the traffic.  This seems a bit of a sledgehammer to crack a nut approach, but what else can be done about it (DDoS attacks) at the moment?  :(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

